<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 19 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217064</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80IB for semi-finished flats, noting the liberal interpretation of tax incentive provisions. It confirmed that the assessee maintained separate accounts for the eligible project, meeting the requirements of Section 80IA(7). However, the ITAT agreed with the AO and CIT(A) in dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal on the disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 36(1)(iii), as the funds were not proven to be used for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 05:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 19 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217064</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80IB for semi-finished flats, noting the liberal interpretation of tax incentive provisions. It confirmed that the assessee maintained separate accounts for the eligible project, meeting the requirements of Section 80IA(7). However, the ITAT agreed with the AO and CIT(A) in dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal on the disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 36(1)(iii), as the funds were not proven to be used for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>