<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 10 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing the conversion of part of the consignment from duty drawback scheme to advance licence scheme. The denial based on already benefiting from duty drawback was deemed unsustainable as the appellants were willing to repay it. The Circular cited did not prohibit conversion, and since part of the consignment was under advance licence, conversion was justified. The Tribunal directed authorities to process the conversion promptly, emphasizing that export obligations under the advance licence should not impede the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 10 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing the conversion of part of the consignment from duty drawback scheme to advance licence scheme. The denial based on already benefiting from duty drawback was deemed unsustainable as the appellants were willing to repay it. The Circular cited did not prohibit conversion, and since part of the consignment was under advance licence, conversion was justified. The Tribunal directed authorities to process the conversion promptly, emphasizing that export obligations under the advance licence should not impede the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>