<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 848 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217040</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the valuation of closing stock of incentive sugar at levy price instead of cost price for Assessment Years 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95, 1996-97, and 1997-98. It emphasized the importance of consistent stock valuation methods aligned with accounting principles and business nature. Relying on precedent and the purpose of the Incentive Scheme, the Court ruled that excess amounts over levy price should not be treated as revenue income. The decision favored the assessee, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeals and highlighting the need for accurate stock valuation in determining taxable profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 848 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217040</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the valuation of closing stock of incentive sugar at levy price instead of cost price for Assessment Years 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95, 1996-97, and 1997-98. It emphasized the importance of consistent stock valuation methods aligned with accounting principles and business nature. Relying on precedent and the purpose of the Incentive Scheme, the Court ruled that excess amounts over levy price should not be treated as revenue income. The decision favored the assessee, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeals and highlighting the need for accurate stock valuation in determining taxable profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>