<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 836 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination due to contradictory findings by the AO and CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering all relevant information and providing the assessee with a proper opportunity to be heard. Both the assessee&#039;s and revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the necessity for a comprehensive and fair reassessment of the issues involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 836 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination due to contradictory findings by the AO and CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering all relevant information and providing the assessee with a proper opportunity to be heard. Both the assessee&#039;s and revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the necessity for a comprehensive and fair reassessment of the issues involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>