<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 834 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217026</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the appeal challenging the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the assessment year 1990-91. The Tribunal upheld the penalty on specific additions due to the assessee&#039;s failure to substantiate explanations, while granting relief on the penalty for a payment to Darashaw &amp;amp; Co. The AO was directed to recompute the penalty accordingly, confirming the penalty on other specified additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 834 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217026</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the appeal challenging the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the assessment year 1990-91. The Tribunal upheld the penalty on specific additions due to the assessee&#039;s failure to substantiate explanations, while granting relief on the penalty for a payment to Darashaw &amp;amp; Co. The AO was directed to recompute the penalty accordingly, confirming the penalty on other specified additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>