<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 816 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217008</link>
    <description>Handmade labelled biris rolled manually from tendu leaves do not become biris manufactured with the aid of machines merely because labels or wrappers are cut and printed by job workers using machines. The decisive factor is that the biris themselves remain handrolled, while machine use is confined to packing materials; on that basis, the Board&#039;s circular dated 6-12-2006 was treated as confirming that such ancillary machine use does not alter the character of the product. The distinction from the cited fireworks precedent was accepted because machine use there related to manufacture of the product itself. The departmental appeals accordingly failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 816 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217008</link>
      <description>Handmade labelled biris rolled manually from tendu leaves do not become biris manufactured with the aid of machines merely because labels or wrappers are cut and printed by job workers using machines. The decisive factor is that the biris themselves remain handrolled, while machine use is confined to packing materials; on that basis, the Board&#039;s circular dated 6-12-2006 was treated as confirming that such ancillary machine use does not alter the character of the product. The distinction from the cited fireworks precedent was accepted because machine use there related to manufacture of the product itself. The departmental appeals accordingly failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>