<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 811 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217003</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, allowing CENVAT credit on input services related to their authorized service station and business auxiliary services. The judgment clarified the eligibility of specific services, disallowing credit on advertisement charges and hotel expenses due to the respondent&#039;s agreement. The tribunal found no justification for penalty imposition on the disallowed services and upheld the demand within the normal limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 811 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217003</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, allowing CENVAT credit on input services related to their authorized service station and business auxiliary services. The judgment clarified the eligibility of specific services, disallowing credit on advertisement charges and hotel expenses due to the respondent&#039;s agreement. The tribunal found no justification for penalty imposition on the disallowed services and upheld the demand within the normal limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>