<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 784 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216976</link>
    <description>Declared value of old and used imported computer monitors could not be enhanced without evidence of comparable goods or reliable market data. The Revenue relied on a suggested price, but no comparable imports were produced on the record, and the record did not establish a market price for second-hand goods. On that evidentiary basis, enhancement of value was not justified and the reassessment was set aside, leaving the assessee&#039;s declared value undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 784 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216976</link>
      <description>Declared value of old and used imported computer monitors could not be enhanced without evidence of comparable goods or reliable market data. The Revenue relied on a suggested price, but no comparable imports were produced on the record, and the record did not establish a market price for second-hand goods. On that evidentiary basis, enhancement of value was not justified and the reassessment was set aside, leaving the assessee&#039;s declared value undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>