<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 772 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement, set aside the initial orders, and remanded the case to the adjudicating Commissioner for further verification of the refund process and compliance with Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. Both appeals were allowed for a detailed examination of the adjustments made by the appellants regarding service tax refunds, emphasizing the importance of cooperation between the department and the assessee in ensuring a fair conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 772 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement, set aside the initial orders, and remanded the case to the adjudicating Commissioner for further verification of the refund process and compliance with Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. Both appeals were allowed for a detailed examination of the adjustments made by the appellants regarding service tax refunds, emphasizing the importance of cooperation between the department and the assessee in ensuring a fair conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>