<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 770 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216962</link>
    <description>In a suit for possession against an unprotected tenant, a decree on admissions may be granted under Order XII Rule 6 CPC where the pleadings clearly admit the landlord-tenant relationship, possession under the landlord, and the agreed rent. The character of use of the premises does not alter the admitted tenancy for this purpose. The note also states that a month-to-month tenancy can be terminated by notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, and that a tenant is estopped under Section 116 of the Evidence Act from disputing the landlord&#039;s title during the tenancy. On that basis, the notice was treated as effective and possession relief was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 770 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216962</link>
      <description>In a suit for possession against an unprotected tenant, a decree on admissions may be granted under Order XII Rule 6 CPC where the pleadings clearly admit the landlord-tenant relationship, possession under the landlord, and the agreed rent. The character of use of the premises does not alter the admitted tenancy for this purpose. The note also states that a month-to-month tenancy can be terminated by notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, and that a tenant is estopped under Section 116 of the Evidence Act from disputing the landlord&#039;s title during the tenancy. On that basis, the notice was treated as effective and possession relief was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>