<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 758 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the &#039;project completion method&#039; consistently followed should be accepted. No income was to be assessed on a presumptive basis for the assessment year 2006-2007, as the income had already been shown in the subsequent year 2007-2008 following the same method. The addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, overturning the decision of the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 758 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the &#039;project completion method&#039; consistently followed should be accepted. No income was to be assessed on a presumptive basis for the assessment year 2006-2007, as the income had already been shown in the subsequent year 2007-2008 following the same method. The addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, overturning the decision of the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>