<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 753 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216945</link>
    <description>An assessee bank&#039;s investment portfolio was treated as stock-in-trade, permitting valuation at cost or market value, whichever is lower, for income-tax purposes. The Tribunal applied the principle that taxable income must reflect real income computed under the regularly employed accounting method and relied on its earlier decision on identical facts in the assessee&#039;s own case. On that basis, the bank&#039;s valuation method was accepted and the claimed deduction was allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s objections were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 753 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216945</link>
      <description>An assessee bank&#039;s investment portfolio was treated as stock-in-trade, permitting valuation at cost or market value, whichever is lower, for income-tax purposes. The Tribunal applied the principle that taxable income must reflect real income computed under the regularly employed accounting method and relied on its earlier decision on identical facts in the assessee&#039;s own case. On that basis, the bank&#039;s valuation method was accepted and the claimed deduction was allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s objections were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>