<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 736 - CESTAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216928</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that penalties should align with the legal provisions in effect at the time of the offense. The penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act was reverted to the original rate of Rs. 100 per day for the relevant period, as the Commissioner exceeded the penalty provisions applicable during that time. The appellant was granted any necessary consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 736 - CESTAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216928</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that penalties should align with the legal provisions in effect at the time of the offense. The penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act was reverted to the original rate of Rs. 100 per day for the relevant period, as the Commissioner exceeded the penalty provisions applicable during that time. The appellant was granted any necessary consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>