<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 705 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216897</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss it due to a delay in filing. The Court emphasized the importance of the right to appeal and the need for a fair opportunity to present a case. Despite acknowledging the assessee&#039;s negligence, the Court imposed costs to balance accountability with the right to appeal and fair representation in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 705 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216897</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss it due to a delay in filing. The Court emphasized the importance of the right to appeal and the need for a fair opportunity to present a case. Despite acknowledging the assessee&#039;s negligence, the Court imposed costs to balance accountability with the right to appeal and fair representation in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>