https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216868 SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2006-CE depended on whether the intermediate product, sugar syrup, fell within the notification's scope, and the record indicated that the corrigendum to the budget notification covered products under Chapters 9 to 20. As the first appellate authority had not considered that corrigendum, the matter required fresh examination. The case was remanded to the first appellate authority to reconsider the SSI exemption claim afresh, taking the corrigendum into account and observing natural justice. en-us Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216868 SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2006-CE depended on whether the intermediate product, sugar syrup, fell within the notification's scope, and the record indicated that the corrigendum to the budget notification covered products under Chapters 9 to 20. As the first appellate authority had not considered that corrigendum, the matter required fresh examination. The case was remanded to the first appellate authority to reconsider the SSI exemption claim afresh, taking the corrigendum into account and observing natural justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216868