<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 673 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216865</link>
    <description>For goods cleared to a sister unit for captive consumption, assessable value was required to be determined by applying CAS-4, including by reference to the treatment of marketing, distribution and advertisement expenses. The Board Circular No. 692/08/2003-CX dated 13-2-2003 was treated as clarificatory and therefore retrospective in effect. On that basis, the valuation method for captively used goods was held to follow CAS-4, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge did not succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 673 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216865</link>
      <description>For goods cleared to a sister unit for captive consumption, assessable value was required to be determined by applying CAS-4, including by reference to the treatment of marketing, distribution and advertisement expenses. The Board Circular No. 692/08/2003-CX dated 13-2-2003 was treated as clarificatory and therefore retrospective in effect. On that basis, the valuation method for captively used goods was held to follow CAS-4, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge did not succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>