<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 672 - GUJARAT  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216864</link>
    <description>Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was construed to preserve full additional duty credit for capital goods already received before 1-3-1997, even if their physical movement into the factory occurred later for practical reasons. The Gujarat HC treated the relevant receipt requirement in a practical, not hyper-technical, manner and held that temporary storage outside the factory, caused by incomplete construction and made with Departmental intimation, did not justify restricting credit to 75% under the amended rule. Full credit was therefore available and denial of credit on the ground of non-receipt in the factory before the amendment date was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 672 - GUJARAT  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216864</link>
      <description>Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was construed to preserve full additional duty credit for capital goods already received before 1-3-1997, even if their physical movement into the factory occurred later for practical reasons. The Gujarat HC treated the relevant receipt requirement in a practical, not hyper-technical, manner and held that temporary storage outside the factory, caused by incomplete construction and made with Departmental intimation, did not justify restricting credit to 75% under the amended rule. Full credit was therefore available and denial of credit on the ground of non-receipt in the factory before the amendment date was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>