<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 669 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216861</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding waiver of pre-deposit of service tax liability for club or association services provided from April 2008 to March 2010. The Tribunal considered the retrospective amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2012 under Section 145, allowing the waiver of pre-deposit and disposal of appeals. The Tribunal also accepted that the appellant had received financial assistance from the State Government for maintaining the affluent treatment plan, similar to a previous case. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 669 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216861</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding waiver of pre-deposit of service tax liability for club or association services provided from April 2008 to March 2010. The Tribunal considered the retrospective amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2012 under Section 145, allowing the waiver of pre-deposit and disposal of appeals. The Tribunal also accepted that the appellant had received financial assistance from the State Government for maintaining the affluent treatment plan, similar to a previous case. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>