https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216859 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the appellant on the ground of limitation. It held that the demand for duty and penalty for the period 2004-05 and 2005-06 was time-barred due to lack of evidence supporting the Department's claim of suppression of information. The penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed without predeposit, as there was no willful concealment of facts by the appellant. en-us Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216859 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the appellant on the ground of limitation. It held that the demand for duty and penalty for the period 2004-05 and 2005-06 was time-barred due to lack of evidence supporting the Department's claim of suppression of information. The penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed without predeposit, as there was no willful concealment of facts by the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216859