<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 642 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the absolute confiscation of the gold bars and Indian currency, reduced penalties imposed on the appellants, and dismissed the appeals. The judgment highlighted the appellants&#039; failure to substantiate the link between the seized gold and the baggage receipt, affirming findings of smuggling based on corroborated statements and circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 642 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the absolute confiscation of the gold bars and Indian currency, reduced penalties imposed on the appellants, and dismissed the appeals. The judgment highlighted the appellants&#039; failure to substantiate the link between the seized gold and the baggage receipt, affirming findings of smuggling based on corroborated statements and circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>