<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 638 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the denial of CENVAT Credit was incorrect. The appellant was deemed eligible for the refund of the CENVAT Credit paid on inputs used in manufacturing goods for export. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 638 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the denial of CENVAT Credit was incorrect. The appellant was deemed eligible for the refund of the CENVAT Credit paid on inputs used in manufacturing goods for export. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>