<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 606 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216798</link>
    <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence was held unjustified at the interim stage where the prescribed revocation procedure was not followed and no final notice was issued within the stipulated time under CBEC Circular No. 9/10 dated 08.04.2010. Although the charge was serious, the licence remained under suspension for more than 28 months without final disclosure of evidence or a final hearing. On those facts, the suspension order was set aside and the licence was restored as an interim measure in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 606 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216798</link>
      <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence was held unjustified at the interim stage where the prescribed revocation procedure was not followed and no final notice was issued within the stipulated time under CBEC Circular No. 9/10 dated 08.04.2010. Although the charge was serious, the licence remained under suspension for more than 28 months without final disclosure of evidence or a final hearing. On those facts, the suspension order was set aside and the licence was restored as an interim measure in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>