https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216797 An appellate court will not interfere with an acquittal unless the trial court's view is perverse or results in gross injustice. In this case, the alleged possession and seizure of foreign-origin gold were not proved beyond reasonable doubt because no seizure mahazar was prepared at the spot, independent witnesses from the busy locality were not examined, and the surrounding circumstances made the prosecution version doubtful. The trial court's acquittal was therefore upheld, and the challenge to it failed. en-us Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 00:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216797 An appellate court will not interfere with an acquittal unless the trial court's view is perverse or results in gross injustice. In this case, the alleged possession and seizure of foreign-origin gold were not proved beyond reasonable doubt because no seizure mahazar was prepared at the spot, independent witnesses from the busy locality were not examined, and the surrounding circumstances made the prosecution version doubtful. The trial court's acquittal was therefore upheld, and the challenge to it failed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216797