<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 597 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216789</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment emphasized the importance of good faith compliance, considering the Appellant&#039;s confusion regarding taxable value determination and small-scale benefit eligibility. The Tribunal found no intent to evade payment, leading to the decision to annul the penalty and provide relief to the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 597 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216789</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment emphasized the importance of good faith compliance, considering the Appellant&#039;s confusion regarding taxable value determination and small-scale benefit eligibility. The Tribunal found no intent to evade payment, leading to the decision to annul the penalty and provide relief to the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>