<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 593 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216785</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the addition of peak credits as income from undisclosed sources. The Court emphasized the lack of substantial evidence linking the assessee to alleged illegal activities and highlighted the necessity for concrete proof to establish such connections. The judgment favored the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and stressing the importance of clear evidence in justifying additions to undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 593 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216785</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the addition of peak credits as income from undisclosed sources. The Court emphasized the lack of substantial evidence linking the assessee to alleged illegal activities and highlighted the necessity for concrete proof to establish such connections. The judgment favored the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and stressing the importance of clear evidence in justifying additions to undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>