<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 592 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216784</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the decisions of the ITAT on Rule 46A compliance and admission of additional evidence. However, the issue of Section 10B exemption was remitted to the AO for further examination to verify the manufacturing activities. The appeals were partly allowed with directions for re-assessment on the manufacturing claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 592 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216784</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the decisions of the ITAT on Rule 46A compliance and admission of additional evidence. However, the issue of Section 10B exemption was remitted to the AO for further examination to verify the manufacturing activities. The appeals were partly allowed with directions for re-assessment on the manufacturing claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>