<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 591 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216783</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to allow bad debts amounting to Rs. 44,51,796, despite pending recovery proceedings before an arbitrator. The Court agreed that the deductions by Delhi Vidyut Board were damages/compensation, not penalties for late delivery, and dismissed the Income Tax Appeal. Additionally, the Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s deletion of an addition of Rs. 2,14,748, considering the payments as legitimate compensation for delayed delivery, not violating Section 40A(3). The Court emphasized that any tax liability would only arise upon actual receipt of the amount by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 591 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216783</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to allow bad debts amounting to Rs. 44,51,796, despite pending recovery proceedings before an arbitrator. The Court agreed that the deductions by Delhi Vidyut Board were damages/compensation, not penalties for late delivery, and dismissed the Income Tax Appeal. Additionally, the Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s deletion of an addition of Rs. 2,14,748, considering the payments as legitimate compensation for delayed delivery, not violating Section 40A(3). The Court emphasized that any tax liability would only arise upon actual receipt of the amount by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>