<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 585 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216777</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the amendment to section 80IB(10) is applicable from A.Y. 2005-06. The project in question, with a commercial built-up area exceeding the permissible limit, did not meet the deduction criteria. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, emphasizing the prospective application of the amendment and the need to adhere to the conditions from A.Y. 2005-06.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 585 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216777</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the amendment to section 80IB(10) is applicable from A.Y. 2005-06. The project in question, with a commercial built-up area exceeding the permissible limit, did not meet the deduction criteria. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, emphasizing the prospective application of the amendment and the need to adhere to the conditions from A.Y. 2005-06.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>