<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 575 - ITAT, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216767</link>
    <description>The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed, confirming the deletion of the addition for payments to Shri Abdul Sattar but remanding the issue of payments to M/s V.R. Enterprises for further verification. The cross-objections by the assessee were also partly allowed, deleting the addition for late EPF payment and remanding the disallowed payments under section 40(a)(ia) for verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 575 - ITAT, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216767</link>
      <description>The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed, confirming the deletion of the addition for payments to Shri Abdul Sattar but remanding the issue of payments to M/s V.R. Enterprises for further verification. The cross-objections by the assessee were also partly allowed, deleting the addition for late EPF payment and remanding the disallowed payments under section 40(a)(ia) for verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>