https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216759 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to procedural lapses, including the absence of a dated authorization by the Committee. Despite presenting records showing approval, the lack of a formal order indicated a casual approach. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with Section 129-A of the Customs Act, highlighting the necessity of Committee authorization. It stressed the importance of the Committee's evaluation before filing an appeal, citing a previous case. The judgment underscored the adverse consequences of procedural lapses and negligence, ultimately leading to the loss of the appeal remedy for the Revenue. en-us Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216759 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to procedural lapses, including the absence of a dated authorization by the Committee. Despite presenting records showing approval, the lack of a formal order indicated a casual approach. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with Section 129-A of the Customs Act, highlighting the necessity of Committee authorization. It stressed the importance of the Committee's evaluation before filing an appeal, citing a previous case. The judgment underscored the adverse consequences of procedural lapses and negligence, ultimately leading to the loss of the appeal remedy for the Revenue. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216759