<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 553 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on both issues regarding business expenditure and repair costs, remanding the cases for fresh review. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed analysis and reasoned orders in accordance with legal requirements. The matter was referred back to the respective authorities for a thorough examination based on relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 553 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on both issues regarding business expenditure and repair costs, remanding the cases for fresh review. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed analysis and reasoned orders in accordance with legal requirements. The matter was referred back to the respective authorities for a thorough examination based on relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>