<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 551 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216743</link>
    <description>The appeals for assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06 were dismissed as the disallowance of interest and finance charges was not justified. However, the appeals for assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09 were allowed for statistical purposes, requiring the Assessing Officer to reconsider the disallowances afresh in accordance with the law, particularly applying Rule 8D for the assessment year 2008-09.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 551 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216743</link>
      <description>The appeals for assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06 were dismissed as the disallowance of interest and finance charges was not justified. However, the appeals for assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09 were allowed for statistical purposes, requiring the Assessing Officer to reconsider the disallowances afresh in accordance with the law, particularly applying Rule 8D for the assessment year 2008-09.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>