<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 539 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the liability for Short Term Capital Gains (STCG) on the transfer of 55% of the undivided land portion under the Joint Development Agreement. However, the issue of deemed consideration under section 50C and the taxability of a non-refundable deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reassessment due to procedural fairness concerns, including the failure to provide the assessee with an opportunity to object and the improper use of information without confrontation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 539 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the liability for Short Term Capital Gains (STCG) on the transfer of 55% of the undivided land portion under the Joint Development Agreement. However, the issue of deemed consideration under section 50C and the taxability of a non-refundable deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reassessment due to procedural fairness concerns, including the failure to provide the assessee with an opportunity to object and the improper use of information without confrontation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>