<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 533 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216725</link>
    <description>The appellate authority confirmed the suppression of clearances due to suppressed production, leading to the confirmation of the duty element under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The penalty under Rule 25 was reduced to Rs. 10,000 as no confiscation was involved. The appeal was dismissed except for the penalty reduction, with no precedent set for general penalty reduction under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 533 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216725</link>
      <description>The appellate authority confirmed the suppression of clearances due to suppressed production, leading to the confirmation of the duty element under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The penalty under Rule 25 was reduced to Rs. 10,000 as no confiscation was involved. The appeal was dismissed except for the penalty reduction, with no precedent set for general penalty reduction under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>