<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 525 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216717</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court found that the transactions through journal entries were not in violation of Section 269SS as they were undertaken to settle mutual liabilities in a reasonable and bona fide manner, thereby deleting the penalties imposed under Section 271D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 525 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216717</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court found that the transactions through journal entries were not in violation of Section 269SS as they were undertaken to settle mutual liabilities in a reasonable and bona fide manner, thereby deleting the penalties imposed under Section 271D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>