<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 515 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216707</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the deduction for wage revision provisions, permitted the interest earned on tax-free bonds between application and allotment, disallowed donations claimed as business expenses, and held that losses of one project could not be set off against profits of other projects under Section 80HHB. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with decisions favoring the assessee on Questions 1, 2, and 4, and in favor of the revenue on Question 3.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 515 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216707</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the deduction for wage revision provisions, permitted the interest earned on tax-free bonds between application and allotment, disallowed donations claimed as business expenses, and held that losses of one project could not be set off against profits of other projects under Section 80HHB. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with decisions favoring the assessee on Questions 1, 2, and 4, and in favor of the revenue on Question 3.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>