<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 479 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216671</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the appellant on both issues, involving the partial denial of deduction under Section 33AC of the Act and the legality of reassessment proceedings. The Court emphasized the necessity for appellate authorities to consider all relevant facts before deciding on points of law, remanding the matters back for fresh consideration to ensure a comprehensive review in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 479 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216671</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the appellant on both issues, involving the partial denial of deduction under Section 33AC of the Act and the legality of reassessment proceedings. The Court emphasized the necessity for appellate authorities to consider all relevant facts before deciding on points of law, remanding the matters back for fresh consideration to ensure a comprehensive review in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>