<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 475 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216667</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT, Delhi upheld the disallowance of commission expenditure for some parties but allowed for one, deeming it a genuine business expenditure. The Tribunal directed further examination by the Assessing Officer for one party. The verification of services rendered by commission agents was criticized for lack of proper summoning, leading to a fresh examination. Disallowance of commission payment to specific parties was upheld for some but allowed for one based on evidence provided. A specific payment was considered an appropriation of income, but the Tribunal found it to be a genuine business expenditure and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 475 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216667</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT, Delhi upheld the disallowance of commission expenditure for some parties but allowed for one, deeming it a genuine business expenditure. The Tribunal directed further examination by the Assessing Officer for one party. The verification of services rendered by commission agents was criticized for lack of proper summoning, leading to a fresh examination. Disallowance of commission payment to specific parties was upheld for some but allowed for one based on evidence provided. A specific payment was considered an appropriation of income, but the Tribunal found it to be a genuine business expenditure and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>