<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 472 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216664</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the appeal filed by the revenue was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the principle of mutuality for the assessee society, exempted the interest income, and treated the capital subsidy as non-taxable. The alleged double addition of miscellaneous income was found to be incorrect. The judgment was pronounced on July 6, 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 472 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216664</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the appeal filed by the revenue was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the principle of mutuality for the assessee society, exempted the interest income, and treated the capital subsidy as non-taxable. The alleged double addition of miscellaneous income was found to be incorrect. The judgment was pronounced on July 6, 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>