<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 470 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216662</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It confirmed that the amendment to section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010 is retrospective from April 1, 2005. As the tax deducted at source was paid before the due date for filing the return, no disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could be made. The assessee&#039;s claim for deduction was allowed, and the appeal by the department was dismissed on July 6, 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 470 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216662</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It confirmed that the amendment to section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010 is retrospective from April 1, 2005. As the tax deducted at source was paid before the due date for filing the return, no disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could be made. The assessee&#039;s claim for deduction was allowed, and the appeal by the department was dismissed on July 6, 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>