<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 437 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216629</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed regarding the deletion of additions related to unaccounted investments in the factory building, unexplained investment in land purchase, unaccounted cash, household valuables, and household expenses for the relevant assessment year. The CIT(A) and Tribunal decisions favored the assessee, highlighting insufficient evidence and lack of proper investigation by the assessing officer. However, the disallowance of interest expenditure was reversed by the Tribunal due to the absence of a clear link between interest-free advances and interest-bearing loans. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 437 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216629</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed regarding the deletion of additions related to unaccounted investments in the factory building, unexplained investment in land purchase, unaccounted cash, household valuables, and household expenses for the relevant assessment year. The CIT(A) and Tribunal decisions favored the assessee, highlighting insufficient evidence and lack of proper investigation by the assessing officer. However, the disallowance of interest expenditure was reversed by the Tribunal due to the absence of a clear link between interest-free advances and interest-bearing loans. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>