<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 433 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216625</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting the deduction of the disputed amount in computing income. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of establishing the crystallization of liabilities for deduction purposes, considering the appellant&#039;s actions, bank entries, and relevant case law. It concluded that the liability had indeed crystallized in the current year, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=190005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 433 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216625</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting the deduction of the disputed amount in computing income. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of establishing the crystallization of liabilities for deduction purposes, considering the appellant&#039;s actions, bank entries, and relevant case law. It concluded that the liability had indeed crystallized in the current year, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>