<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 427 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The judgments clarified the interpretation of Section 44AE for assessing truck income and stressed the significance of valid explanations with proper documentation to counter claims of unaccounted income based on seized documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 427 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The judgments clarified the interpretation of Section 44AE for assessing truck income and stressed the significance of valid explanations with proper documentation to counter claims of unaccounted income based on seized documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>