<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 425 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216617</link>
    <description>The court modified the order, restoring the CHA license from 1.10.2012, subject to the security deposit being made by 30.9.2012. If the deposit is made after 1.10.2012, the license will be restored from the date of deposit. The court considered the appellant&#039;s first violation, substantial business suspension, and deemed a lenient view appropriate. It emphasized that this decision was case-specific and not a precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 425 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216617</link>
      <description>The court modified the order, restoring the CHA license from 1.10.2012, subject to the security deposit being made by 30.9.2012. If the deposit is made after 1.10.2012, the license will be restored from the date of deposit. The court considered the appellant&#039;s first violation, substantial business suspension, and deemed a lenient view appropriate. It emphasized that this decision was case-specific and not a precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>