<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 423 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216615</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on the assessable value of imported goods, vendor exclusivity, and valuation principles was dismissed. The dispute over discounts in the invoice and the vendor&#039;s exclusivity was resolved in favor of the importers due to lack of evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims. The Tribunal rejected the estoppel argument, noting the importers&#039; appeal against the original adjudication, which indicated non-acceptance of the enhanced value. Consequently, the Commissioner (Appeals) decision was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 423 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216615</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on the assessable value of imported goods, vendor exclusivity, and valuation principles was dismissed. The dispute over discounts in the invoice and the vendor&#039;s exclusivity was resolved in favor of the importers due to lack of evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims. The Tribunal rejected the estoppel argument, noting the importers&#039; appeal against the original adjudication, which indicated non-acceptance of the enhanced value. Consequently, the Commissioner (Appeals) decision was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>