<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 418 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216610</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in a case concerning the valuation of inputs for excise duty purposes. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing a Board circular that clarified the valuation rules for inputs transferred to a sister unit. The circular emphasized reversing CENVAT Credit when goods are transferred without sale. The tribunal held that the circular&#039;s guidance was correctly applied, and the Revenue cannot challenge its own binding circulars. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order. The judgment underscores the importance of following valuation rules and Board circulars for excise duty compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 418 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216610</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in a case concerning the valuation of inputs for excise duty purposes. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing a Board circular that clarified the valuation rules for inputs transferred to a sister unit. The circular emphasized reversing CENVAT Credit when goods are transferred without sale. The tribunal held that the circular&#039;s guidance was correctly applied, and the Revenue cannot challenge its own binding circulars. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order. The judgment underscores the importance of following valuation rules and Board circulars for excise duty compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>