https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216607 The High Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reject the restoration of the appeal application. The Court found that the petitioner consistently failed to comply with deposit requirements set by various authorities, including the Supreme Court, leading to non-compliance with previous orders. Due to the petitioner's history of non-compliance, the Court saw no reason to interfere with the decision to deny restoration of the appeal. As a result, the petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216607 The High Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reject the restoration of the appeal application. The Court found that the petitioner consistently failed to comply with deposit requirements set by various authorities, including the Supreme Court, leading to non-compliance with previous orders. Due to the petitioner's history of non-compliance, the Court saw no reason to interfere with the decision to deny restoration of the appeal. As a result, the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216607