<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 413 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216605</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the activity of grinding and smoothening edges of rough iron castings on a job work basis did not attract service tax during the specified period. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and supported by previous Tribunal judgments, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 413 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216605</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the activity of grinding and smoothening edges of rough iron castings on a job work basis did not attract service tax during the specified period. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and supported by previous Tribunal judgments, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>