<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 409 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216601</link>
    <description>A liaison office carrying on only preparatory and auxiliary activities was not treated as a business connection or permanent establishment in India. Offshore supply of hardware and embedded software was held to be a completed sale outside India, with title and risk passing abroad; the software was a copyrighted article rather than a transfer of copyright rights, so the receipts were not taxable as royalty and interest under section 234B was not leviable on the non-resident. Attribution of profits to the alleged permanent establishment and any notional interest on delayed consideration or vendor financing required fresh factual reconsideration and was remitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 409 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216601</link>
      <description>A liaison office carrying on only preparatory and auxiliary activities was not treated as a business connection or permanent establishment in India. Offshore supply of hardware and embedded software was held to be a completed sale outside India, with title and risk passing abroad; the software was a copyrighted article rather than a transfer of copyright rights, so the receipts were not taxable as royalty and interest under section 234B was not leviable on the non-resident. Attribution of profits to the alleged permanent establishment and any notional interest on delayed consideration or vendor financing required fresh factual reconsideration and was remitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>