https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216594 The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in determining the cost of acquisition of tenancy rights and found that the differential interest borne by the assessee did not represent the cost of acquisition. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, remanding the matter to the Tribunal for further action. en-us Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216594 The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in determining the cost of acquisition of tenancy rights and found that the differential interest borne by the assessee did not represent the cost of acquisition. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, remanding the matter to the Tribunal for further action. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216594